Don't Let Your Babies Grow Up to Be DEA

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
DEA agent tell a Maryland doctor he can no longer prescribe medication. As they are leaving he shouts:

    Your mothers wanted you to become physicians and because you didn't, they are mad at you. So you are mad at physicians and are arresting all physicians in the area.
Later, things get weird and the doctor's wife puts him in a full Nelson.

Malpractice Reform in Florida

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
There is a non-stop methodical effort by malpractice tort reform advocates to find creative way to limit malpractice lawsuits.  For whatever reason, a lot of this creativity seems to come from Florida.  The latest?  Deem doctors "agents of the state" to avail themselves to local/state government tort claims immunities.  

When You Can't Serve the Defendant with the Complaint

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
In many personal injury cases, just the mechanics of filing suit dramatically increases the value.  One leitmotif of a problem: serving the defendant.  If, for whatever reason, someone does not want to be served, they are hard to serve with a complaint and summons.  

This is a motion for alternative service for personal injury lawyers who are having difficult serving the defendant(s). 

Ohio Cap on Pain and Suffering Damages

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Ohio adopted at pain and suffering cap of 250,000 except in catastrophic cases in 2004.  The hope was to decrease health care costs.

Ohio, how is that working out for you?  In 2008, four years after Ohio introduced these caps, health insurance for Ohio families in employer plans had gone up by 19 percent.

Cut Bile Duct Settlements: Gallbladder Injury

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
According to USLaw, the average settlement in a cut bile duct gallbladder medical malpractice case is $250,000.

Famous Medical Malpractice Cases

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Two of the most famous medical malpractice cases - at least potentially -  in history have occurred in the last year: Joe Murtha and Michael Jackson.  In Maryland, we also recently had the St. Joseph's stent debacle which may go down in Maryland history as its most famous medical malpractice cases.  

What has surprised a lot of medical malpractice lawyers is how little these cases have reflected the public mood on malpractice.  People who learn of these cases simply process them consistent with the world view they already had on the topic of whether malpractice cases are largely meritorious and whether the system needs to be changed.  

Malpractice During Colonoscopy

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
The Maryland Daily Record reports that a Baltimore City jury ordered a doctor to pay $670,000 to a man who required emergency surgery to remove a portion of his colon because of injuries suffered during a routine colonoscopy in 2006.  The doctor allegedly punctured Johnson's colon in several places during the colonscopy  according to the complaint. Johnson was taken to the ER at Siani Hospitalwhere surgeons removed some of his colon (Siani was not named in the lawsuit).

Medication Errors in Maryland

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
One cause of malpractice injuries in Maryland is medication errors.  Most are harmless but a minority of medication mistakes end in tragedy.  

Two leading health care organizations announce a plan to reduce medication errors, announcing a new national alert system that helps prevent dangerous and repeated medication errors. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) and the Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP) are partnering to develop the National Alert Network for Serious Medication Errors (NAN). 

Will it help?  Who knows?  But we need to try more solutions to the medical error problem in this country, even if it means a few failed plans.  

Health Care Reform and Our Malpractice Tort Laws

| No Comments | No TrackBacks
Humbert J. Polito Jr., of Polito & Quinn, LLC and president of the Connecticut Trial Lawyers Association writes this editorial about tort reform and health care. 
Good line from  Tom Baker, a professor of law and health sciences at the University of Pennsylvania School of Law and author of "The Medical Malpractice Myth," in the New York Times:

"According to the actuarial consulting firm Towers Perrin, medical malpractice tort costs were $30.4 billion in 2007, the last year for which data are available. We have a more than a $2 trillion health care system. That puts litigation costs and malpractice insurance at 1 to 1.5 percent of total medical costs. That's a rounding error. Liability isn't even the tail on the cost dog. It's the hair on the end of the tail."

Baker's conclusion is that medical malpractice reform is a red herring for those who don't want real change in health care.  This might be a legitimate concern but these folks are using malpractice as an intellecutally dishonest sword in their battle.

Related Blogs

Contact Our Firm

  • NAME
  • EMAIL
  • PHONE
  • COMMENTS

Contact Our Firm

  • NAME
  • EMAIL
  • PHONE
  • COMMENTS

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.